Showing posts with label awful. Show all posts
Showing posts with label awful. Show all posts

August 2, 2009

the answer is hoooooooooooooooooooooooome

About once a year there is absolutely, positively nothing on. My DVR becomes a barren wasteland. Looking at it fills me with despair. The dreaded question springs into my mind--'What am I going to watch?' I turn to the On Demand channels, which I assume are one reason I pay a billion dollars a month for cable, but they rarely fill more than one evening. So in these times of crisis, I turn to reruns. (I wonder what percentage of programming is made up of reruns; I bet its an unsettling number.)

I think reruns are best enjoyed when it is a show you've never seen and you wait until the first episode of the series is on. That way, you can watch every episode, in order, conveniently rationed out into daily servings of old TV. Even a show like Seinfeld, where there really is no storyline that you need to follow, is best viewed in its original order. There is something discommoding about seeing someone age ever so slightly in just twenty minutes. I have done this ever since my dad decided to buy this new fangled contraption called a TiVo back when nobody knew what a TiVo was. I can still remember describing it to very uninterested people who acted like it was the most worthless thing they'd ever heard of (and now cannot live without DVRs). I watched a show called Ladies Man due to an untreated Alfred Molina obsession that still sort of leaves me scratching my head. I guess I just like big lugs. Anyway, after that I started watching ER. I'd never watched it and it was broadcast on TNT for two hours every morning. By the end of that year, I was an ER expert.

It opened my eyes. Just because you don't watch a show the first time around, doesn't mean you can't someday enjoy it just the same. For instance, Lost, Heroes and 24. All are (or were, at least) hit shows that I just couldn't fit into my DVR schedule. Summer brings reruns of current shows, but they're sometimes shown out of order or missing an episode. They're just not very reliable. I would definitely have watched all three of those shows, had I not committed myself to two other shows on at the same time. I can rest easy, though, because if those shows are as great as the hype, someday TNT or TBS or WGN will rerun them. And that's when I will make my move.

Over the years I've watched Ladies Man, ER, Saddle Club (er...nevermind), Little House on the Prairie, Sex and the City, The Sopranos, Seinfeld, and Boston Public and probably a few others my brain doesn't feel like remembering. There is a strange joy from watching them this way. I'm not sure quite what the difference is, either, aside from the fact that they are no longer new and no longer hot. I can't think of any sort of simile to reason it out. Its a modern mystery, perhaps. In any case, it gets me through those unbearable summer TV months without having to turn to drivel like Wipeout or More to Love (what I consider worthwhile and what I consider drivel is entirely arbitrary).

However, Hallmark Channel has pulled the rug right out from under me. For quite a while now, I have been enjoying two hours of 7th Heaven a day. This is a show I watched early in its original run, but I was the same age as Simon when it was on, so my memory is lacking. I lovingly refer to it as a study in bad TV. Early on its not quite as bad, but once Brenda Hampton is given free reign anything can happen. Its just ridiculous. All of the actors (with the exception of Stephen Collins) are thoroughly terrible but in the same way. The shots are cheesy, the plotlines are ludicrous and the dialogue, well, it speaks for itself (I couldn't resist). Its like every layer, every possible thing, is consistently bad. Its like the ugliest quilt you've ever seen. The stitches are uneven, but they're uneven in the same way, throughout. The colors are bug fugnuts and yet somehow they work together to make something uniformly awful. Its the worst thing you've ever laid eyes on but you have to look closer and really study it. Its like an ugly dog that you fall in love with at the pound, even though it has three legs and mange and is incontinent. Somehow, some way, its hideousness becomes endearing.

But Hallmark seems to think it necessary to add yet another hour of both Touched By An Angel and Little House on the Prairie to its schedule, for a total of 6 hours a day of those shows. And the worst part is, there was no warning. My DVR told me about the future episodes of 7th Heaven and allowed me to schedule them for recording. It even recorded what it thought was two 7th Heaven's that were not. Why did they do this to me? Did they read my relentless mocking on Twitter and take it to heart? Are there really people who have been crying out for more Touched By An Angel? Or did 7th Heaven turn out to be just too risque for them, after having to censor "butt" and "boob" one too many times? Whatever the reason, I am heartbroken. I had come to enjoy those two beastly hours a day. What would Brenda have for me? What new friends in need of help would the kids make today? What embarrassing guest appearance would fill me with delight? Would Peter Graves show up?? Would there be a whole plotline just about a pot roast? Ah. It seems like only yesterday.What would possess Hallmark to make such an abrupt change? I am genuinely interested. I have very little knowledge about television programming decisions. But I really wish they'd change their minds. Letter writing campaign, anyone?

I think the worst part is that I was left high and dry. There are desperate TV times and I simply can't afford to lose that much programming with no warning. And now I am left wondering----What am I gonna watch???

April 14, 2009

Breaking Dawn, briefly.

Ok, I know. I suck at blogging lately. I've got to come up with a way to fit it into my routine, because work is rarely slow enough for bloggery anymore.

As you might imagine, I don't remember as much about Breaking Dawn as I did after I read it. Its been a few months. This is why I must form a blogging schedule. Or start writing things down as I read. Or both.

I felt that Breaking Dawn was the least terrible of the four, just because it was a much quicker read because things actually happened aside from Bella thinking about stuff. Also we get Jacob as a narrator for a while and the break from Bella was much appreciated by me. While more interesting it still lacked action. Buildup with no payoff. I won't ruin the ending but I can tell you I was sort of excited, wondering what was going to happen and then....Meyer tricked me!! She made it seem like it wasn't going to be her same old boring stupid crap and then it IS her same old boring stupid crap.

I still don't understand why anyone likes these books. I found nothing about the story interesting. Its the lamest vampires ever meeting up with the lamest person in the world, Bella. They were frustratingly repetitive when it came to word usage. I'm very glad to finally be done with the series and am now embarking on my quest to figure out what people do like about it. There are quite a few folks I do not consider stupid, and yet they've told me that they like the books. I must pick their brains.

Coming up! Mini-review of Lies My Teacher Told Me by James Loewen.

Currently reading...A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson.

Just finished...Wonder Woman by Jodi Picoult!

March 4, 2009

Book Review: The Politically Incorrect Guide to Capitalism

I went into the library with a specific book on economics in mind and, when it wasn't there, I decided to get this one instead. Several months later I can say with a heaving sigh of relief that I have finally finished this piece of trash. I didn't notice that it was a Main Selection of the Conservative Book Club when I checked it out. It is, thus far, the most infuriating book I have ever read (and I've read Ann Coulter).

The author's tone is extremely condescending and he proves all of his points with stupid examples that would almost never occur in real life. And he usually then goes on to completely contradict himself. For example, the male-female wage gap is "largely" a myth. Also, because of FMLA, women deserve smaller salaries because they are more likely to take time off which will cost the company money. I mean, where do you even begin with that kind of logic? Anyone with a brain sees why that's wrong, anyone who thinks its right is so far into Idiot-Land that there's really no point in arguing.

Dr. Murphy will have us believe that capitalism solves all of the world's problems but that pesky government thing just keeps getting in the way! He claims that slavery was a burden to slave-owners and that it cost more to have slave labor than to not. The government just made it too difficult to get rid of slaves. If not for government interference, he claims, capitalism would've ended slavery naturally.

Did you know that capitalism also solves the problem of racism? For instance, if there are two waitresses, a black experienced waitress and a less-experienced white waitress, the racist business owner will lose money with the less-experienced waitress, thus capitalism solved that one. Yes, this is actually the example given to prove that point. Also, affirmative action hurts minorities.

Contradictions loom around every corner. The "manufacturing slump" isn't really real... And its not caused by outsourcing. What? Also, out-sourcing is good. Why? Because the corporations that out-source save more money than is forfeited by its laid-off workers. This makes America riiiich, says my good friend Dr. Murphy. Well, no. This is why the top fifth is twelve times richer than the bottom fifth. Most economists don't care at all about the rich, whines Murphy; "as if rich Americans aren't a part of America".

This one may be the most mind-boggling-- seat belt laws cause more accidents because people drive more recklessly because they are wearing a seat belt and hit more pedestrians. I promise I am not making this up.

Okay, I've reached my limit. That's really more than you even needed to know. If you'd like a book to make you violently angry, I suggest picking up this one.

I shall leave you with a couple of steps in Dr. Murphy's 12 Step Plan for Understanding the Free Market:
10. Study other "spontaneous" social institutions, such as language and science, where no one is "in charge" and yet the outcome is quite orderly.
12. Go through the newspaper and discover how government meddling causes or exacerbates the conflict in virtually every story.

Yes. Do that. See what you find.

With heavy heart I shall return this book to the library instead of dropping it into the Ohio.

-1,000,000,000,000,000,000 outsourced stars from China/5